Tuesday, 19 January 2010

Peer Evaluation Feedback - Emma



After watching our film in a lesson twice, the rest of the class evaluated it for us. They said we had

  • Good Framing
  • Good Attention to Detail (The Ransom Note)
  • Good Locations (The room the hostage was in)
  • An Appropriate Use of Sound
  • Good performance on our actors part
  • Good Camera Movement
  • Some Continuity Errors (The Paper missing and the Door Opening the Wrong Way)
  • A Dodgy Cut (When Craig Was Entering The Room)

And that the pace could have been quicker.

I was happy to hear that they thought the sound worked well as I spent quite a bit of time on it, and that the framing worked well.

In regards to the continuity errors, we should have paid a lot more attention. They could have been eliminated in the planning stages if we’d spent enough time on it.

The dodgy cut was due to a technical malfunction, as the end of the first shot had fuzzed up. We would have used the full second shot, but it didn’t start in the same place, so we edited it together the best we could.

This evaluation has again helped me realise that we need to devote a lot more time to the planning stages and pay way more attention to detail.

No comments:

Post a Comment